Iroquois vs British West Indian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
British West Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

British West Indians

Fair
Tragic
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
938
SOCIAL INDEX
6.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
333rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

British West Indian Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,018,673 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.999. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 24.9 British West Indians.
Iroquois Integration in British West Indian Communities

Iroquois vs British West Indian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 39.2%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,299, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,844, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $49,636, a difference of 0.53%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $88,987, a difference of 1.8%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $75,647, a difference of 1.8%).
Iroquois vs British West Indian Income
Income MetricIroquoisBritish West Indian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Tragic
$40,330
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$88,987
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$75,647
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Tragic
$44,552
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Tragic
$49,636
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Good
$40,299
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Fair
$51,844
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$85,565
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$85,571
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$51,463
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
18.0%

Iroquois vs British West Indian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 32.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 30.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.37%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Iroquois vs British West Indian Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisBritish West Indian
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
15.9%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
15.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
21.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
21.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
21.3%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
22.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
31.5%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
17.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
17.9%

Iroquois vs British West Indian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 37.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 36.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.5%).
Iroquois vs British West Indian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisBritish West Indian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.8%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
24.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.6%

Iroquois vs British West Indian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 37.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.77%).
Iroquois vs British West Indian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisBritish West Indian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
64.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
29.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
70.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
81.2%

Iroquois vs British West Indian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 20.4%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.3%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.12%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and family households (62.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.83%).
Iroquois vs British West Indian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisBritish West Indian
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
38.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Tragic
39.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
38.0%

Iroquois vs British West Indian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 171.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 87.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 26.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 54.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 69.9%).
Iroquois vs British West Indian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisBritish West Indian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
29.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
70.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
35.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Tragic
11.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
3.5%

Iroquois vs British West Indian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 44.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.93%).
Iroquois vs British West Indian Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisBritish West Indian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
90.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
88.5%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
85.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
82.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
59.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Tragic
42.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
34.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Iroquois vs British West Indian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 52.2%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.99%, a difference of 46.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Iroquois vs British West Indian Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisBritish West Indian
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Poor
12.0%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
0.99%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
24.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.8%