Iroquois vs French American Indian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
French American Indian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
French American Indians
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,780
SOCIAL INDEX
15.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
288th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
French American Indian Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,910,561 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 7.9 French American Indians.
Iroquois vs French American Indian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $48,977, a difference of 3.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $89,811, a difference of 2.9%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $40,244, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $36,920, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $54,699, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | French American Indian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Tragic $40,244 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Tragic $92,872 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Tragic $76,387 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Tragic $43,333 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Tragic $50,611 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Tragic $36,920 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Tragic $48,977 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Tragic $85,899 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Tragic $89,811 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Tragic $54,699 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Good 25.4% |
Iroquois vs French American Indian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 9.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.53%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | French American Indian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 13.9% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 10.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 22.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 20.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 18.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 19.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 15.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 24.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 17.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 33.1% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Iroquois vs French American Indian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | French American Indian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Iroquois vs French American Indian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.29%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | French American Indian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 78.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 39.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 76.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 80.8% |
Iroquois vs French American Indian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 4.4%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.31%), currently married (44.7% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 0.71%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | French American Indian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 62.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Tragic 44.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Tragic 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Tragic 36.6% |
Iroquois vs French American Indian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.6%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.61%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | French American Indian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Average 89.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Average 55.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Iroquois vs French American Indian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.2%), associate's degree (42.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | French American Indian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Good 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Poor 90.7% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Fair 88.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 62.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 55.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 42.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 33.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Iroquois vs French American Indian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.7%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.20%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.96%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | French American Indian |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 25.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 48.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.7% |