Iroquois vs Jordanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,546,052 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.943. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.105% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 104.8 Jordanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $109,376, a difference of 25.4%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $91,794, a difference of 23.6%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $109,865, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,796, a difference of 9.3%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $41,464, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 44.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 40.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 34.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.7%), family households (62.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 28.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.3%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 28.0%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.10%), 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 41.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.5%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 5.2%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.8%).