Iroquois vs Czech Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Czech
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Czechs
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czech Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,440,612 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.102% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 101.7 Czechs.
Iroquois vs Czech Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $103,507, a difference of 18.6%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $105,839, a difference of 16.9%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $38,992, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,421, a difference of 8.5%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $47,221, a difference of 11.3%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Czech |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Good $44,595 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Excellent $105,839 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Good $86,164 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Good $47,221 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Excellent $56,546 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Poor $38,992 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Poor $51,421 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Good $96,525 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Excellent $103,507 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Average $61,244 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Tragic 29.2% |
Iroquois vs Czech Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 47.0%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 44.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.5%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.4%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Czech |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Good 28.9% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Iroquois vs Czech Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 29.0%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Czech |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Iroquois vs Czech Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Czech |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 43.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 83.9% |
Iroquois vs Czech Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 25.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.6%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Czech |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Good 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Excellent 30.5% |
Iroquois vs Czech Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 59.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Czech |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Exceptional 6.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 93.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Exceptional 61.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Exceptional 22.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Iroquois vs Czech Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.2%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Czech |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Exceptional 91.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 67.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Good 47.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Average 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Good 1.9% |
Iroquois vs Czech Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 27.1%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.6%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Czech |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |