Iroquois vs South African Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
South African
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
South Africans
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,851
SOCIAL INDEX
86.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
44th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
South African Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,368,459 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.204% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 203.8 South Africans.
Iroquois vs South African Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $50,044, a difference of 28.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $109,719, a difference of 25.8%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $93,379, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,383, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $41,825, a difference of 14.9%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | South African |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Exceptional $50,044 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Exceptional $113,229 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Exceptional $93,379 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Exceptional $50,752 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Exceptional $61,460 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Exceptional $41,825 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Poor $51,383 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Exceptional $103,160 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Exceptional $109,719 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Exceptional $65,652 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Tragic 28.0% |
Iroquois vs South African Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 36.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 35.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 8.7%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 13.3%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | South African |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Excellent 12.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 21.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Excellent 13.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Average 12.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Excellent 20.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Iroquois vs South African Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | South African |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.4% |
Iroquois vs South African Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | South African |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Good 65.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Average 36.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Fair 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Fair 82.6% |
Iroquois vs South African Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 25.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.8%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.33%), family households (62.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | South African |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Excellent 47.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Tragic 3.17 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Exceptional 47.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Excellent 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Excellent 30.5% |
Iroquois vs South African Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.67%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | South African |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Good 90.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Fair 6.2% |
Iroquois vs South African Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 54.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 46.5%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | South African |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Exceptional 92.4% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 87.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 69.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 64.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Exceptional 51.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 43.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Iroquois vs South African Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 34.4%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.8%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | South African |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 21.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 45.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Fair 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |