Iroquois vs Hungarian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,494,888 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.107. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 13.8 Hungarians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $103,913, a difference of 19.1%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $86,920, a difference of 17.0%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $105,609, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $50,247, a difference of 6.0%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,510, a difference of 8.5%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $47,795, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 25.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.8%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.60%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.5%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 20.6%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.7%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.7%).