Iroquois vs Asian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Asian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Asians
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,712
SOCIAL INDEX
84.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
56th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Asian Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,564,792 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Asians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 22.7 Asians.
Iroquois vs Asian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $101,681, a difference of 36.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $118,426, a difference of 35.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $112,666, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $57,003, a difference of 20.3%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $44,586, a difference of 22.5%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Asian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Exceptional $50,057 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Exceptional $119,955 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Exceptional $101,681 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Exceptional $53,690 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Exceptional $63,827 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Exceptional $44,586 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Exceptional $57,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Exceptional $112,666 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Exceptional $118,426 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Exceptional $68,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Tragic 26.9% |
Iroquois vs Asian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Asian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 57.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 53.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.2%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Asian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 14.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 13.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 26.0% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Excellent 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Iroquois vs Asian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Asian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Good 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iroquois vs Asian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Asian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Iroquois vs Asian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 42.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.28, a difference of 3.8%), family households (62.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 8.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Asian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 29.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Exceptional 3.28 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Iroquois vs Asian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Asian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 91.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Exceptional 57.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Exceptional 20.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Iroquois vs Asian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Asian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 52.1%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 49.1%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.2% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.25%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Asian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 94.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Good 91.4% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Good 89.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 69.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Exceptional 52.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 44.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 18.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Iroquois vs Asian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 52.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 43.3%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.6%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Asian |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Excellent 46.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |