Iroquois vs Bermudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,054,543 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.992. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.527% in Bermudans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 526.6 Bermudans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $42,911, a difference of 9.7%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,418, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $47,359, a difference of 0.040%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $88,231, a difference of 5.4%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $52,465, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 28.7%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.38%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.3%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 19.6%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.030%), high school diploma (89.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 20.2%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.1%).