Iroquois vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,005,753 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 55.6 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $32,345, a difference of 20.9%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $41,758, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $71,697, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $44,003, a difference of 7.7%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $67,965, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 51.4%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 35.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 117.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 117.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 104.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 23.3%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.64, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 49.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 44.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 36.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 36.9%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 45.4%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.6%).