Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Immigrants from Costa Rica

Fair
Fair
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,937
SOCIAL INDEX
36.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
208th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Costa Rica Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,327,200 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.193% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 193.3 Immigrants from Costa Rica.
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Costa Rica Communities

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $100,141, a difference of 14.8%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $85,054, a difference of 14.5%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $101,354, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,186, a difference of 7.6%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $53,237, a difference of 7.8%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Income
Income MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Costa Rica
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Average
$43,464
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Fair
$101,354
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Average
$85,054
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Fair
$45,928
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Fair
$53,237
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Fair
$39,186
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Good
$52,643
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Fair
$92,876
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Average
$100,141
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Fair
$59,848
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
24.7%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 29.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 26.2%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.96%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 5.7%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Costa Rica
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Fair
9.4%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Fair
11.3%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Fair
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Fair
16.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Fair
16.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Good
20.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
12.2%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.74%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Costa Rica
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
5.5%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Poor
5.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
5.6%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Costa Rica
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Fair
74.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Fair
82.6%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 14.5%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Costa Rica
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
65.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
33.4%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.49%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Costa Rica
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Good
10.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Average
89.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Average
55.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Good
6.5%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.6%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.46%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Costa Rica
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
94.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
92.7%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
91.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
84.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
63.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
57.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Poor
45.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Fair
36.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Fair
1.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 33.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.2%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Costa Rica
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Good
2.4%