Iroquois vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,843,963 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.897. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 40.2 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $47,394, a difference of 21.2%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $89,496, a difference of 20.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $104,992, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,914, a difference of 9.6%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $41,527, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 39.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 38.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.0%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 25.9%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.0%), family households (62.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.8%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 34.8%), male disability (13.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 25.5%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 14.4%).