Iroquois vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,848,379 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.070% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 70.0 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $29,031, a difference of 34.7%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $70,989, a difference of 27.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $66,529, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $33,046, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $42,380, a difference of 11.8%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 115.3%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 75.5%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 15.4%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 84.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 79.0%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 72.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 34.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 34.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 27.0%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (62.2% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.2%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 40.6%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 36.7%), and associate's degree (42.8% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%), 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 31.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.6%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.2%).