Iroquois vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,953,908 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.831. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.052% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 52.2 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $83,289, a difference of 12.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $97,284, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $59,837, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $50,609, a difference of 6.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $90,372, a difference of 8.0%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 24.2%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.98%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 15.7%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.22%), currently married (44.7% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.8%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.50%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.1%), and male disability (13.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 7.3%).