Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sri Lankan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Sri Lankans

Fair
Good
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,460
SOCIAL INDEX
72.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
116th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sri Lankan Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,866,463 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.607. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Sri Lankans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 45.5 Sri Lankans.
Iroquois Integration in Sri Lankan Communities

Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $93,093, a difference of 25.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $108,270, a difference of 24.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $101,960, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.0%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,496, a difference of 11.2%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $44,014, a difference of 12.6%).
Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Income
Income MetricIroquoisSri Lankan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Average
$44,014
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Exceptional
$108,234
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Exceptional
$93,093
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Exceptional
$48,040
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Excellent
$56,136
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Excellent
$40,496
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Exceptional
$55,470
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Exceptional
$101,960
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Exceptional
$108,270
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Exceptional
$64,201
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Average
25.8%

Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 43.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 42.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.2%).
Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisSri Lankan
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
26.7%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
12.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.6%

Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%).
Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisSri Lankan
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisSri Lankan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Fair
74.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.2%

Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 32.0%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 5.8%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.35, a difference of 6.1%), and family households (62.2% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 8.8%).
Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisSri Lankan
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
67.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
49.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.35
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Exceptional
28.9%

Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 44.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 29.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 21.2%).
Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisSri Lankan
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
92.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Exceptional
61.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Exceptional
23.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
8.4%

Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 61.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.77%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisSri Lankan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
90.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
89.4%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
84.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Average
65.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Average
46.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Average
38.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.9%

Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 40.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.8%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.060%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.7%).
Iroquois vs Sri Lankan Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisSri Lankan
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
48.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Excellent
2.4%