Iroquois vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,580,356 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.441. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.264% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 264.3 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $61,000, a difference of 13.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $50,691, a difference of 7.0%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $47,177, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($90,543 compared to $90,345, a difference of 0.22%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $87,864, a difference of 0.70%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $75,574, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.30%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 16.2%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.1%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.1%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 0.76%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.99%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.6%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 44.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.53%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.67%).