Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from South Africa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Immigrants from South Africa

Fair
Exceptional
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,269
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
25th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from South Africa Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,543,700 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from South Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Immigrants from South Africa.
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from South Africa Communities

Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $51,465, a difference of 31.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $112,886, a difference of 29.4%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $95,800, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,705, a difference of 9.1%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $42,508, a difference of 16.8%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Income
Income MetricIroquoisImmigrants from South Africa
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Exceptional
$51,465
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Exceptional
$116,286
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Exceptional
$95,800
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Exceptional
$51,850
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Exceptional
$62,899
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Exceptional
$42,508
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Fair
$51,705
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Exceptional
$105,748
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Exceptional
$112,886
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Exceptional
$67,234
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Tragic
28.5%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 39.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 39.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 8.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 11.7%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisImmigrants from South Africa
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Poor
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.7%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisImmigrants from South Africa
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.3%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisImmigrants from South Africa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Good
36.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Fair
74.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Average
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Average
82.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 30.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.030%), family households (62.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.6%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisImmigrants from South Africa
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Exceptional
48.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Exceptional
29.3%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 11.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.30%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from South Africa
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Average
19.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Fair
6.2%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 62.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 53.0%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.10%), 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisImmigrants from South Africa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
70.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
65.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Exceptional
52.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Exceptional
44.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
18.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.4%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 39.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.3%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 6.9%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from South Africa Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from South Africa
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
45.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%