Iroquois vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,429,187 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 16.8 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 10.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,525, a difference of 8.7%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $46,736, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $87,705, a difference of 0.52%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $54,526, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $82,331, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.7%), male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.9%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 1.1%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 83.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and associate's degree (42.8% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.4%).