Iroquois vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,476,181 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.781. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.285% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 285.5 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 12.2%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $35,999, a difference of 8.6%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $33,775, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $53,060, a difference of 1.3%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $47,729, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $45,450, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 17.2%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 16.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.43%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 9.8%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and associate's degree (42.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.8%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 26.4%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.33%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 8.8%).