Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bahamas
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Immigrants from Bahamas

Fair
Tragic
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,107
SOCIAL INDEX
8.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
322nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bahamas Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,252,946 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Immigrants from Bahamas. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 24.3 Immigrants from Bahamas.
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Bahamas Communities

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 19.1%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $45,176, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $76,910, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $53,174, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $45,793, a difference of 3.5%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $35,027, a difference of 3.9%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Income
Income MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bahamas
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Tragic
$37,193
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$84,732
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$71,349
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Tragic
$39,861
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Tragic
$45,176
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Tragic
$35,027
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Tragic
$45,793
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$76,910
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$83,177
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$53,174
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
21.1%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 16.3%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.58%), female poverty (15.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bahamas
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
21.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
16.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
20.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
21.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
22.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
31.1%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
15.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.72%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.90%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bahamas
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
20.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
10.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.1%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bahamas
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
64.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
78.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
82.3%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.7%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (62.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bahamas
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
26.3%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
41.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Tragic
41.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
40.1%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.7%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bahamas
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
52.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.3%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.070%), bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bahamas
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
91.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
90.2%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
88.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
84.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
61.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
55.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Tragic
42.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
33.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bahamas communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bahamas Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bahamas
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Poor
2.5%