Iroquois vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,796,119 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.398. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 47.4 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $65,854, a difference of 22.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $106,849, a difference of 22.5%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $90,618, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,259, a difference of 8.2%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,798, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 49.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 44.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 10.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 33.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.8%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.3%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.38%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 42.3%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 40.6%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 37.3%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.9%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.81%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.1%).