Iroquois vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,008,903 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 29.3 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $30,256, a difference of 29.2%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $72,193, a difference of 25.4%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $39,543, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $45,248, a difference of 4.7%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $49,121, a difference of 9.4%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $33,205, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 103.8%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 90.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 74.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 23.5%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.1%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 32.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 92.1%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 78.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 27.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 46.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 31.1%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.1%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and family households (62.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 36.0%), associate's degree (42.8% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 34.7%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 41.6%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.7%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.1%).