Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,693,866 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 47.3 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $103,584, a difference of 18.7%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $87,553, a difference of 17.9%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $106,188, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 0.58%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $52,374, a difference of 10.5%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,739, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 29.3%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 26.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 25.2%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.65%), family households (62.2% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 0.55%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.6%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 36.5%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.22%), 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 28.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.34%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 11.7%).