Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Trinidadians and Tobagonians

Fair
Poor
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,253,753 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 1.7 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.
Iroquois Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities

Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 29.8%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,958, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $52,631, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $55,327, a difference of 3.0%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $51,446, a difference of 4.2%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $94,466, a difference of 4.3%).
Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Income
Income MetricIroquoisTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Tragic
$41,655
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$94,466
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$80,402
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Fair
$45,820
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Tragic
$51,446
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Exceptional
$40,958
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Good
$52,631
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$89,856
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$91,357
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$55,327
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
19.3%

Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 22.8%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 21.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.81%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and poverty (14.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
19.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
19.3%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
15.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
16.0%

Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 29.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.7%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
22.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Poor
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.2%

Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 29.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisTrinidadian and Tobagonian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
30.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
71.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
81.9%

Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (62.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 4.8%).
Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
40.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Tragic
41.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
36.5%

Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 116.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 52.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 16.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 33.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 42.8%).
Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisTrinidadian and Tobagonian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
23.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
76.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
40.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Tragic
13.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
4.3%

Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 38.0%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (56.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 0.68%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisTrinidadian and Tobagonian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
92.4%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
89.4%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
86.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
61.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
55.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Tragic
43.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
35.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 48.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.61%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisTrinidadian and Tobagonian
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Average
11.7%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Average
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Poor
23.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.7%