Iroquois vs Nepalese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,644,488 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Nepalese within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.081% in Nepalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 81.0 Nepalese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $54,472, a difference of 15.0%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $82,410, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $49,458, a difference of 0.17%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $38,442, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $43,860, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.0%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.9%), male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and poverty (14.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 19.8%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.060%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 48.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 102.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 27.4%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.68%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 49.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.1%), female disability (14.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.7%).