Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,412,381 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.352. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 19.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $54,714, a difference of 15.5%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,910, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $55,394, a difference of 3.1%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $94,665, a difference of 4.5%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $51,642, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 36.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.54%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 32.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.7%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 23.7%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 135.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 65.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 20.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 41.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 55.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 67.1%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (56.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.59%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 70.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 52.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.84%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.2%).