Iroquois vs Immigrants from Western Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,405,861 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Western Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 4.8 Immigrants from Western Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $50,065, a difference of 28.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $108,824, a difference of 24.7%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $112,688, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $52,957, a difference of 11.8%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $41,990, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 33.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 32.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.8%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (62.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.55%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 54.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 52.4%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.10%), 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.8%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.5%).