Iroquois vs Malaysian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Malaysian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Malaysians
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Malaysian Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,153,493 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 6.3 Malaysians.
Iroquois vs Malaysian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $81,064, a difference of 9.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,615, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $58,244, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.14%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $39,194, a difference of 0.23%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $37,298, a difference of 2.5%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Malaysian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Tragic $39,194 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Tragic $95,230 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Tragic $81,064 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Tragic $43,844 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Tragic $50,772 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Tragic $37,298 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Poor $51,615 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Tragic $88,291 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Tragic $94,517 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Tragic $58,244 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Excellent 25.0% |
Iroquois vs Malaysian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.9%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.2%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Malaysian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Poor 9.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Good 19.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 18.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 17.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 22.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Iroquois vs Malaysian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Malaysian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 5.3% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Poor 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 5.5% |
Iroquois vs Malaysian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Malaysian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Fair 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 39.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 77.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 82.0% |
Iroquois vs Malaysian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 14.4%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.6%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.31, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Malaysian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Poor 45.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Tragic 33.9% |
Iroquois vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 42.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 16.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Malaysian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Iroquois vs Malaysian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.74%), bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.94%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Malaysian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 94.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 93.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 92.2% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 90.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 89.2% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Tragic 87.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 83.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 62.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 55.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 41.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 32.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Iroquois vs Malaysian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Malaysian |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.5% |