Iroquois vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,889,941 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $101,387, a difference of 16.2%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $84,965, a difference of 14.4%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $103,273, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $38,738, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,224, a difference of 8.1%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $46,658, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 34.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 32.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.9%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.8%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 19.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.97%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (62.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 39.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.1%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.7%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 4.1%).