Iroquois vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,635,353 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.540. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 88.3 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 22.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $50,852, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $91,956, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($42,430 compared to $42,615, a difference of 0.43%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $91,763, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $52,888, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.6%), and female poverty (15.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 4.8%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.8%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and family households (62.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.070%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.3%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.1%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.7%).