Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Cuba
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Immigrants from Cuba

Fair
Fair
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Cuba Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,706,131 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.599. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 10.4 Immigrants from Cuba.
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Cuba Communities

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $44,735, a difference of 20.1%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $78,249, a difference of 15.7%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $43,461, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $50,374, a difference of 6.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $80,662, a difference of 8.2%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $68,461, a difference of 8.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Income
Income MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Cuba
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Tragic
$34,910
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$78,249
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$68,461
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Tragic
$38,426
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Tragic
$43,461
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Tragic
$33,291
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Tragic
$50,374
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$76,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$80,662
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$44,735
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
22.4%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 53.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 50.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.19%), female poverty (15.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Cuba
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.6%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
11.3%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
18.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
30.1%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
17.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
20.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 7.7%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Cuba
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 32.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Cuba
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
30.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
72.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.7%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 18.4%), family households (62.2% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 1.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Cuba
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
68.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
44.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Tragic
43.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
15.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
41.5%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.7%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Cuba
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.7%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 49.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.7%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Cuba
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
93.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
93.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
88.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
83.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
80.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
55.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
50.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Tragic
39.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
30.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
10.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.2%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.4%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.6%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Cuba Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Cuba
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.8%