Iroquois vs Uruguayan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Uruguayan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Uruguayans
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Uruguayan Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,508,545 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.974. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.356% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 356.5 Uruguayans.
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $84,691, a difference of 14.0%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $44,318, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $98,660, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 0.30%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,228, a difference of 7.7%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $53,680, a difference of 8.7%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Good $44,318 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Fair $100,656 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Average $84,691 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Average $46,190 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Fair $53,680 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Fair $39,228 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Good $52,465 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Fair $93,631 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Fair $98,660 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Poor $59,090 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Excellent 25.2% |
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 30.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Average 12.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Fair 9.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Fair 13.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Good 13.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Good 17.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Average 16.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Good 16.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.8% |
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Excellent 83.1% |
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 15.4%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (62.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Poor 45.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Tragic 45.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Poor 33.1% |
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.47%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 11.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 88.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Tragic 52.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.3%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.41%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 94.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 92.9% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 90.4% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Tragic 88.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Poor 85.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Poor 64.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Fair 58.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Average 46.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Good 38.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Fair 1.8% |
Iroquois vs Uruguayan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 40.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.7%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Uruguayan |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.4% |