Iroquois vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Tsimshian
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,979,670 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.209% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 209.0 Tsimshian.
Iroquois vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $97,809, a difference of 16.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $54,649, a difference of 15.3%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $83,346, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.1%), median earnings ($42,430 compared to $43,695, a difference of 3.0%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $40,344, a difference of 3.2%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Iroquois vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 78.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 49.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 8.1%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 15.7% |
Iroquois vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 133.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 78.8%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Poor 5.6% |
Iroquois vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 77.4% |
Iroquois vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.9%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Tragic 42.2% |
Iroquois vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 27.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Fair 6.2% |
Iroquois vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.2%), bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.72%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.4% |
Iroquois vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 65.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 29.3%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.0%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |