Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hispanic or Latino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Hispanics or Latinos

Fair
Tragic
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
991
SOCIAL INDEX
7.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
328th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hispanic or Latino Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,069,385 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.126. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.058% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 58.0 Hispanics or Latinos.
Iroquois Integration in Hispanic or Latino Communities

Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $35,688, a difference of 9.6%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $46,419, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $50,279, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($74,279 compared to $73,823, a difference of 0.62%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $86,006, a difference of 1.5%).
Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Income
Income MetricIroquoisHispanic or Latino
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Tragic
$35,688
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$85,647
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$73,823
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Tragic
$40,288
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Tragic
$46,419
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Tragic
$34,421
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Tragic
$50,279
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$80,515
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$86,006
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$52,832
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Excellent
24.9%

Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 36.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisHispanic or Latino
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.9%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
16.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
16.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
21.0%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
24.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
33.3%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
15.8%

Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.67%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisHispanic or Latino
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.6%

Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.64%).
Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisHispanic or Latino
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
77.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
74.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
82.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
80.1%

Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 14.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and family households (62.2% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (44.7% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisHispanic or Latino
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
67.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
29.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
45.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Tragic
44.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
37.8%

Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 15.1%).
Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisHispanic or Latino
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
9.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Exceptional
22.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.6%

Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 61.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 21.5%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisHispanic or Latino
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
92.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
92.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
90.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
88.9%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
87.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
85.4%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
82.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
79.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
57.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
51.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Tragic
37.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
29.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
10.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%

Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.020%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Iroquois vs Hispanic or Latino Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisHispanic or Latino
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
26.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
50.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.7%