Iroquois vs South American Indian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
South American Indian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
South American Indians
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
South American Indian Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,224,136 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.182% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 182.4 South American Indians.
Iroquois vs South American Indian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $87,446, a difference of 17.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $101,171, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $62,215, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,019, a difference of 9.9%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $54,508, a difference of 10.4%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | South American Indian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Good $44,206 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Good $103,624 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Excellent $87,446 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Good $46,952 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Average $54,508 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Good $40,019 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Excellent $52,979 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Good $96,497 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Good $101,171 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Good $62,215 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Iroquois vs South American Indian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 29.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 26.6%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.6%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | South American Indian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Fair 12.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Fair 9.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Fair 11.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Fair 13.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Average 20.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Average 17.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Average 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Fair 16.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Good 20.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Average 29.3% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.9% |
Iroquois vs South American Indian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | South American Indian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Fair 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Fair 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 5.5% |
Iroquois vs South American Indian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | South American Indian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Poor 35.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Good 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Good 82.9% |
Iroquois vs South American Indian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 20.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.7%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (62.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | South American Indian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Exceptional 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Poor 45.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Average 31.7% |
Iroquois vs South American Indian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | South American Indian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 88.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Tragic 53.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Average 6.3% |
Iroquois vs South American Indian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.6%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.41%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | South American Indian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 92.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Average 65.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Good 60.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Good 47.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Excellent 39.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Excellent 15.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 4.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Excellent 2.0% |
Iroquois vs South American Indian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 31.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.0%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | South American Indian |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Excellent 10.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Good 23.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Excellent 2.4% |