Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,166,044 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 14.8 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $87,046, a difference of 17.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $102,190, a difference of 17.1%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $104,966, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 0.80%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $52,611, a difference of 11.0%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,704, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 36.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 32.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 11.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 29.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.72%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.3%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 31.5%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (89.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 39.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 12.5%).