Iroquois vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,157,075 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.311. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 17.0 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $106,611, a difference of 22.2%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $90,605, a difference of 22.0%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $108,429, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.9%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,757, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $53,185, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 41.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 36.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 24.5%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.3%), family households (62.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.7%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 40.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.5%).