Iroquois vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,235,347 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 42.6 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $83,582, a difference of 12.5%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $60,043, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $52,810, a difference of 7.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $90,137, a difference of 7.7%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $42,164, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.4%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 19.4%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.36%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.7%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.0%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 50.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.9%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.43%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.1%), male disability (13.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 5.7%).