Iroquois vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,838,235 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.779. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 49.4 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $38,088, a difference of 2.7%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $48,202, a difference of 2.4%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $88,556, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.16%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $47,518, a difference of 0.29%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $73,747, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.11%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 6.0%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.60%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.9%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.76%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.5%), associate's degree (42.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.92%), disability (13.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.4%).