Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina

Fair
Average
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,212
SOCIAL INDEX
59.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
160th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,100,388 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.650. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.556% in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 555.6 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Communities

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $42,278, a difference of 8.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $94,288, a difference of 8.1%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $97,432, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 0.95%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $55,986, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $88,819, a difference of 6.1%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Income
Income MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Poor
$42,278
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$97,432
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$79,888
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Fair
$45,600
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Poor
$52,869
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Poor
$38,886
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Tragic
$50,565
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$88,819
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$94,288
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$55,986
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
24.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 29.9%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Good
12.0%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Excellent
8.4%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Good
13.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Average
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Fair
17.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Fair
16.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Good
11.3%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.0%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
15.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
66.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
86.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.3%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 26.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.23%), family households (62.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Fair
46.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Excellent
30.3%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.98%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.2%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Good
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Tragic
17.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.3%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 13.2%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.10%), 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Fair
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Excellent
94.2%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Excellent
89.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Average
46.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Average
37.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
14.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.7%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.8%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.9%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Average
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.5%