Iroquois vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,811,963 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.838. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.407% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 406.6 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $98,896, a difference of 13.3%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $60,608, a difference of 12.8%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $83,193, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $38,283, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $50,447, a difference of 6.5%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $45,732, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.2%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 24.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.13%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.7%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 14.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.69%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 35.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.0%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 15.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.9%).