Iroquois vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,531,664 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.087% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 87.3 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 12.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $58,375, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $91,293, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $49,201, a difference of 0.35%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $39,529, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $47,916, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 17.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.9%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 0.57%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.7%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.74%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.5%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.9%), male disability (13.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 5.5%).