Iroquois vs Paraguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,105,932 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Paraguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 18.7 Paraguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $95,737, a difference of 28.9%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $50,385, a difference of 28.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $106,615, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $55,614, a difference of 17.4%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $43,173, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 46.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 45.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 28.7%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 31.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 58.6%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 45.9%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and high school diploma (89.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 46.0%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 39.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 7.7%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.1%).