Iroquois vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,768,055 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.825. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.213% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 213.4 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $54,000, a difference of 14.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $60,748, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $93,991, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $49,711, a difference of 0.68%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $39,558, a difference of 1.2%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.1%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 63.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 57.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 34.5%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.37, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.24%), currently married (44.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 58.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.7%), associate's degree (42.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.080%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 102.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.2%).