Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bangladeshi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Bangladeshis

Fair
Fair
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,611
SOCIAL INDEX
23.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
249th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bangladeshi Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,468,281 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.626. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.236% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 236.0 Bangladeshis.
Iroquois Integration in Bangladeshi Communities

Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.1%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $35,897, a difference of 8.9%), and median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $46,744, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($74,279 compared to $74,112, a difference of 0.23%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $47,589, a difference of 0.44%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $86,402, a difference of 0.99%).
Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Income
Income MetricIroquoisBangladeshi
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Tragic
$35,897
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$88,358
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$74,112
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Tragic
$41,263
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Tragic
$46,744
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Tragic
$35,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Tragic
$47,589
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$81,363
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$86,402
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$54,719
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
22.2%

Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.0%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 16.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), female poverty (15.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and family poverty (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisBangladeshi
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
16.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
15.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
20.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
20.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
20.0%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
24.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
31.7%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
15.0%

Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.14%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.75%).
Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisBangladeshi
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.3%

Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisBangladeshi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Exceptional
42.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
81.3%

Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.50%), currently married (44.7% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (62.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisBangladeshi
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
30.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Tragic
43.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
34.4%

Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 12.5%).
Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisBangladeshi
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Exceptional
58.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.6%

Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 88.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.9%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.6%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisBangladeshi
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
90.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
89.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
86.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
61.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Tragic
40.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.2%

Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Iroquois vs Bangladeshi Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisBangladeshi
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
26.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
49.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.8%