Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Nigeria
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Immigrants from Nigeria

Fair
Fair
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,310
SOCIAL INDEX
20.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
263rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Nigeria Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,387,019 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.454. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.031% in Immigrants from Nigeria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 30.8 Immigrants from Nigeria.
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Nigeria Communities

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $58,942, a difference of 9.7%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $81,236, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,104 compared to $40,339, a difference of 3.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $86,589, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $49,174, a difference of 3.8%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Income
Income MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Nigeria
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Tragic
$40,339
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Tragic
$96,439
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Tragic
$81,236
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Poor
$45,030
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Tragic
$51,310
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Fair
$39,294
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Tragic
$49,174
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Tragic
$86,589
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Tragic
$94,804
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Poor
$58,942
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
22.7%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 22.1%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.47%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Nigeria
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
19.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
18.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
18.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.1%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.99%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Nigeria
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
11.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.1%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Nigeria
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
66.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Good
83.0%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.6%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (44.7% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (62.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.4%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Nigeria
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
43.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Tragic
43.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
35.4%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Nigeria
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
88.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
52.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Poor
18.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Poor
6.1%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 33.5%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.0%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.40%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Nigeria
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
94.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
92.7%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
91.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
63.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Poor
44.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Fair
36.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Fair
1.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 44.3%), male disability (13.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 5.9%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Nigeria Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Nigeria
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%