Iroquois vs Burmese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Burmese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Burmese
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Burmese Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,724,261 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 1.8 Burmese.
Iroquois vs Burmese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $121,444, a difference of 39.2%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $103,145, a difference of 38.9%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $123,369, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 11.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $54,800, a difference of 15.7%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $44,911, a difference of 23.4%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Burmese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Exceptional $52,005 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Exceptional $123,369 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Exceptional $103,145 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Exceptional $54,559 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Exceptional $65,236 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Exceptional $44,911 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Exceptional $54,800 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Exceptional $113,701 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Exceptional $121,444 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Exceptional $71,139 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Tragic 28.0% |
Iroquois vs Burmese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 66.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 57.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 14.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.0%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Burmese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 18.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 26.2% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Iroquois vs Burmese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 34.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Burmese |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Excellent 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Iroquois vs Burmese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Burmese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Tragic 34.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 73.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Iroquois vs Burmese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 44.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.7%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.8%), family households (62.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 9.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Burmese |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Exceptional 49.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Iroquois vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Burmese |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Exceptional 20.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Iroquois vs Burmese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 66.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 65.0%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Burmese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Excellent 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Excellent 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Excellent 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Excellent 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Good 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Excellent 97.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 94.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Exceptional 90.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 88.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 71.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 66.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Exceptional 54.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 46.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 19.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Iroquois vs Burmese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 55.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 44.1%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.0%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Burmese |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 20.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 45.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |