Iroquois vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,880,856 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.646. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.116% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 115.9 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $89,100, a difference of 20.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $64,416, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $103,705, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,297, a difference of 10.7%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $47,617, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 30.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 29.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 24.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.1%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.2%), and family households (62.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.0%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.89%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 6.2%).