Iroquois vs Bulgarian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,401,897 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.998. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.313% in Bulgarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 313.0 Bulgarians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $113,883, a difference of 30.5%), per capita income ($39,104 compared to $50,906, a difference of 30.2%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $117,818, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 11.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $54,352, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $43,638, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 58.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 55.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 12.5%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 24.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 34.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 41.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.0%), family households (62.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 53.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 49.4%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 48.3%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 7.5%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.7%).