Iroquois vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,978,649 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of British within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $106,264, a difference of 21.8%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $108,705, a difference of 20.1%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $88,914, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,477, a difference of 8.6%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $39,772, a difference of 9.2%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $48,189, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 39.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 36.0%), and family poverty (10.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.6%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 23.4%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 24.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.77%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 44.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 12.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 36.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.7%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.4%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 6.5%).