Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Immigrants from Uzbekistan

Fair
Fair
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,141
SOCIAL INDEX
38.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
204th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Uzbekistan Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,730,454 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.369. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 8.3 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Uzbekistan Communities

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $46,929, a difference of 20.0%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $43,363, a difference of 19.1%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $50,151, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $56,331, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $103,197, a difference of 14.0%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Income
Income MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Exceptional
$46,929
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Average
$103,197
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Good
$86,425
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Exceptional
$50,151
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Exceptional
$57,941
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Exceptional
$43,363
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Exceptional
$54,846
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Exceptional
$98,849
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Average
$100,523
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Tragic
$56,331
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
22.7%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 35.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 29.3%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 5.3%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.0%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Excellent
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Fair
17.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Excellent
20.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Average
29.3%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
16.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.3%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 37.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Average
5.4%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 37.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Uzbekistan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
29.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
82.3%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 48.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
45.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Exceptional
25.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 143.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 78.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 21.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 44.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 62.2%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Uzbekistan
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
26.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
73.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
37.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Tragic
12.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
3.6%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 40.1%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 38.5%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.78%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Uzbekistan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
92.6%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Excellent
61.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Exceptional
50.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Exceptional
42.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
17.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Excellent
2.0%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 71.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 44.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.5%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.9%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
0.85%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.9%